<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: WGIG Report: Understanding it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wortfeld.de/2005/07/wgig_report_understanding_it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wortfeld.de/2005/07/wgig_report_understanding_it/</link>
	<description>Das Weblog von Alexander Svensson über Medien, Netzpolitik et cetera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Dr Stuey&#8217;s IWD &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who should control the Internet?</title>
		<link>http://www.wortfeld.de/2005/07/wgig_report_understanding_it/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Stuey&#8217;s IWD &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who should control the Internet?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wortfeld.de/?p=639#comment-665</guid>
		<description>[...] There was mixed reporting and reaction from around the web. The BBC simply reported the four proposals for Internet governance that the WGIG report contained and that a further meeting in Novemeber would decide between them. A German blog called Wortfeld produced a PDF with a very useful unofficial visualisation of the 4 options to aid understanding of how they differ. New Scientist explained some of the technical details behind the scenes, highlighted the US-dominance of the Net and mentioned WGIG will have a hard time getting the US to give up it&#8217;s control of the heart of the Net.   Posted in Internet &#124; by drstuey &#124; Sun, July 31st, 2005 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was mixed reporting and reaction from around the web. The BBC simply reported the four proposals for Internet governance that the WGIG report contained and that a further meeting in Novemeber would decide between them. A German blog called Wortfeld produced a PDF with a very useful unofficial visualisation of the 4 options to aid understanding of how they differ. New Scientist explained some of the technical details behind the scenes, highlighted the US-dominance of the Net and mentioned WGIG will have a hard time getting the US to give up it&#8217;s control of the heart of the Net.   Posted in Internet | by drstuey | Sun, July 31st, 2005 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

